Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences

By I. McNish. 2007

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57676b5fdd62905477f191ca8992775d7f8f95d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task (2011, methodology): “The use of reaction time grew and has persisted during the whole of the 20th century and into the 21st century (for example, as described in Aufdembrinke, Hindmarch and Ott 1988; Deary, 2000; Jensen, 2006).”
Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy (2009, background): “…responses can only be given after the ‘‘word’’ response has timed out, ‘‘nonword’’ response are necessarily slow.10 Phenomenon 3: IQ People with a high IQ tend to respond faster than people with a low IQ, a regularity that is reported across a wide range of cognitive tasks (Jensen, 1998, 2006).”
Processing speed, working memory and reasoning ability from childhood to old age (2010, methodology): “This study tested a suggestion by Jensen (2006) that putative changes in brain structure responsible for declining cognitive abilities during adulthood and old age may be a mirror image of structural changes responsible for improving cognitive development during childhood. This proposition derives f”
Intelligence and neural efficiency. (2009, unknown): “…contributions of Hick (1952) and Roth (1964) to the field of individual differences in elementary cognitive processing have led to a renaissance of chronometric approaches to human intelligence (Deary, 2000; Jensen, 2006, provide excellent reviews on individual differences in mental chronometry).”
Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. (2016, background): “In published research, correlations among psychometric test scores, and correlations between psychological assessment scores and performance criteria, generally range between 0 and .5 (cf. Jensen, 2006; Meyer et al., 2001; Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein, 1991).”
When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not (2013, methodology): “, power) tests (Jensen, 2006).”
Intelligence: Foundations and Issues in Assessment (2009, background): “but was revived later in the 20th century by scholars searching for the fundaments of psychometric g (Jensen, 2006).”