Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?) (2018, methodology): “…validated and most established models to reflect core cognitive processes employed in a wide range of experimental tasks (Forstmann et al., 2016; Ratcliff et al., 2016; Voss et al., 2015; Wagenmakers, 2009), it is likely that data simulated by this model differ from real data in various respects.”
An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience (2015, background): “These difficulties have no doubt been exacerbated by the lack of introductory textbooks on the topic, although recent entries (including the book you are reading now; see also [14, 62]) may encourage researchers with this expertise to start offering courses in their own universities.”
How to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution (2012, methodology): “In two simulation studies we used the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Ratcliff & McKoon, 2008; Wagenmakers, 2009) to make the scenarios described above more concrete.”