The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Psychometric Features and Prospective Relationships with Depression and Anxiety in Adults
By N. Garnefski, V. Kraaij. 2007
885 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5749a431d3091e3b73c70421f6bc958698872dae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Ian H. Gotlib
- Barbara L. Fredrickson
- Jutta Joormann
- Eric L. Garland
- S. Gaylord
- P. Velotti
- Daniela Villani
- F. Biassoni
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Ian H. Gotlib
- Barbara L. Fredrickson
- Jutta Joormann
- Eric L. Garland
- S. Gaylord
- Jonas Everaert
- P. Velotti
- Denise Sloan
Citations in the corpus
- Rumination in Clinical Depression: A Type of Emotional Suppression? (2011, positive): “In contrast to early studies of rumination that focused on the process as a trait-like response style (e.g., Nolen-Hoeksema 2000), recent research has examined the use of rumination as a maladaptive cognitive emotion-regulation strategy associated with the experience of depression (e.g., Garnefski ”
- The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version (2012, background): “A study with general adult population yielded test-retest correlations of subscales ranging between 0.48 (refocus on planning) and 0.65 (other-blame; Garnefski and Kraaj 2007).”
- Emotions in uniform: How nurses regulate emotion at work via emotional boundaries (2011, background): “Perspective taking (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2007) Adopting a cognitive perspective of the situation that minimizes its emotional impact.”
- Positive Reappraisal Mediates the Stress-Reductive Effects of Mindfulness: An Upward Spiral Process (2011, background): “” The CERQ has been shown to have good internal consistency and convergent validity with subscales of the SCL-90 (Garnefski et al. 2001; Garnefski and Kraaij 2007).”
- Cognition and Depression: Current Status and Future Directions (2010, background): “…these studies support the formulation that the more-frequent use of certain strategies (e.g., emotion suppression, rumination, catastrophizing) and less-frequent use of other strategies (e.g., reappraisal, self-disclosure) are related to symptoms of depression and anxiety (Garnefski & Kraaij 2007).”
- Emotion Regulation Difficulties Related to Depression and Anxiety: A Network Approach to Model Relations Among Symptoms, Positive Reappraisal, and Repetitive Negative Thinking (2019, background): “…divergent validity in both nonclinical and clinical samples, the positive-reappraisal subscale converges with measures of anxiety and depression (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006, 2007; Garnefski et al., 2001) and diverges with certain problems in emotion regulation such as the limited access to…”
- Emotion Regulation in Depression: Relation to Cognitive Inhibition (2010, positive): “We also replicated previous findings, obtained mostly with non-diagnosed samples, of differences between depressed and non-depressed participants in the habitual use of emotion-regulation strategies (Campbell-Sills et al., 2006; Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006, 2007; Gross & John, 2003).”
- Developing emotion abilities and regulation strategies in a sport organization: An action research intervention (2013, background): “The questionnaire has been reported to have satisfactory factorial validity and reliabilities (α = .75 and .87) (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007).”
- Cognitive emotion regulation strategies: Gender differences and associations to worry (2010, methodology): “Previous research documents a strong conceptual and empirical factor structure for the CERQ (i.e. Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007; Garnefski et al., 2001).”
- Individual Differences in Cognitive Emotion Regulation: Implications for Subjective and Psychological Well-Being (2016, background): “In this study, we expected to replicate the findings of previous research examining individual differences in cognitive emotion regulation, with (1) individuals reporting to more frequently use adaptive strategies, such as refocus on planning and positive reappraisal, than less adaptive strategies, ”