Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? (2003, background): “In fact, when inter-stimulus intervals were manipulated in a systematic manner, the auditory processing of dyslexics was not found to be poorer at short than at long intervals, and sometimes it was better [18 ,20 ,21,22 ].”
On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography. (2008, background): “Even English-speaking adults with reading disability have poor awareness of phonemes (e.g., Bruck, 1992; Chiappe et al., 2002; Felton, Naylor, & Wood, 1990).”
Developmental dyslexia in adults : a research review (2004, unknown): “For example, one recent study found that although reading-disabled adults showed simple, across-the-board deficits at the level of reaction time, there was no evidence of the group-byrate interaction that is central to the timing deficit hypothesis (Chiappe et al., 2002).”