Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ABC of Ambivalence: Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Consequences of Attitudinal Conflict (2015, unknown): “The relation between ambivalence and creativity is indirectly supported by research in which dialectical thinking (related to ambivalence; Hamamura et al., 2007) was associated with creativity (Benack, Basseches, & Swan, 1989).”
Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research (2012, background): “8 & Shavitt (2005) and Harzing (2006) suggested that national-level collectivism might be related to middle (and acquiescent) responses styles, a relationship also found by Smith (2004) for acquiescent responses.”
Communication Styles as Dimensions of National Culture (2011, background): “America (Hamamura et al., 2008; Peng & Nisbett, 1999).”
Need Satisfaction and Well-Being (2013, background): “Our predictions regarding cultural differences in need satisfaction were largely inferred from the more extensive literature on cultural differences in well-being, in which lower dialecticism (or non–East Asian cultural membership) and greater individualism have been associated with greater self-est”