Estimating the Energy Security Benefits of Reduced U.S. Oil Imports 1
By P. Leiby. 2007
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56b59e8e5b3ed1df84b2ef5bf5cd0a132bb105d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jeremy J. Michalek
- G. Santos
- Hannah Behrendt
- Alexander Teytelboym
- P. Jones
- Steven Van Passel
- S. B. Peterson
- Laura Maconi
Citations in the corpus
- The economics of enhanced landfill mining: private and societal performance drivers (2013, background): “Leiby (2007) shows that fossil fuel energy prices do not fully incorporate this macroeconomic risk.”
- Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport (2010, background): “These costs include the transfer of wealth from the importing country to the oil producing country, a decrease in the maximum product the importing country would be capable of if oil prices were competitive (as opposed to monopolistic or oligopolistic) and any macroeconomic adjustment costs driven b”
- The Economics of a Blend Mandate for Biofuels (2009, unknown): “The import supply elasticity is derived similarly to that of ethanol supply, where an OPEC supply elasticity of 0.71 is assumed, in the range of Leiby (2007), while we use the excess demand of other oil importers excluding the United States to be −0.86 as in Leiby (2007).”
- Cost-effectiveness of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery capacity and charging infrastructure investment for reducing US gasoline consumption (2013, background): “…of $0.10/gal ($0– $0.30/gal) (Brown, 2010), increases in payment of world oil prices due to additional US consumption of $0.24/gal ($0.08–$0.49/gal) (Leiby, 2007), and increases in military costs due to US oil consumption of $0.03/gal ($0–$0.17/gal) (Delucchi and Murphy, 2008), resulting in a…”
- Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach (2010, background): “At the same time, the United States, China, India and Japan, the world’s largest energy importers, and other regional actors are looking for ways to reduce their vulnerability to energy supply (or demand) disruptions and cut down on their emissions.”