Psychological Flexibility as a Fundamental Aspect of Health
By T. Kashdan. Clinical Psychology Review, 2010
2,708 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Traditionally, positive emotions and thoughts, strengths, and the satisfaction of basic psychological needs for belonging, competence, and autonomy have been seen as the cornerstones of psychological health. Without disputing their importance, these foci fail to capture many of the fluctuating, conflicting forces that are readily apparent when people navigate the environment and social world. In this paper, we review literature to offer evidence for the prominence of psychological flexibility in understanding psychological health. Thus far, the importance of psychological flexibility has been obscured by the isolation and disconnection of research conducted on this topic. Psychological flexibility spans a wide range of human abilities to: recognize and adapt to various situational demands; shift mindsets or behavioral repertoires when these strategies compromise personal or social functioning; maintain balance among important life domains; and be aware, open, and committed to behaviors that are congruent with deeply held values. In many forms of psychopathology, these flexibility processes are absent. In hopes of creating a more coherent understanding, we synthesize work in emotion regulation, mindfulness and acceptance, social and personality psychology, and neuropsychology. Basic research findings provide insight into the nature, correlates, and consequences of psychological flexibility and applied research provides details on promising interventions. Throughout, we emphasize dynamic approaches that might capture this fluid construct in the real-world.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/562bd4799b6dfabdc7800a28353b11332d36b661
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Gal Sheppes
- James J. Gross
- T. Kashdan
- Stefan G. Hofmann
- A. Aldao
- A. Masuda
- Joseph Ciarrochi
- Sharon K. Parker
In Social Psychology
- T. Kashdan
- Richard M. Ryan
- M. Steger
- Sharon K. Parker
- James J. Gross
- Hooria Jazaieri
- Christopher P. Niemiec
- Joseph Ciarrochi
Citations in the corpus
- Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity -Trajectories of minimal-impact resilience and emergent resilience (2012, positive): “More recently, a third perspective has begun to emerge that integrates these ostensibly disparate processes around the construct of flexibility (Bonanno, 2005; Cheng, 2001; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”
- Transitioning From High School to College (2013, background): “…been associated with lower levels of internalizing symptoms such as anxiety and depression in adolescents (Chuang, Lamb, & Hwang, 2006; Hofer, Eisenberg, & Reiser, 2010; Trask-Tate, Cunningham, & Lang-DeGrange, 2010) as well as in young adults (Brookings & Bolton, 1997; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”
- The unbearable lightness of meaning: Well-being and unstable meaning in life (2013, background): “At the other end of the spectrum, perhaps people low in meaning could be encouraged to be more flexible and engage in curious exploration of potentially meaningful experiences (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010; Kashdan & Steger, 2007).”
- EMOTION DYSREGULATION MODEL OF MOOD AND ANXIETY DISORDERS (2012, background): “[58] Of note, emotional flexibility is closely associated with the more general term psychological flexibility, which is the ability to adapt to a variety of different situational demands by shifting one’s mindset or behaviors.[60] Similarly, it has been assumed that it is coping flexibility, rather”
- The Role of Mindfulness and Psychological Flexibility in Somatization, Depression, Anxiety, and General Psychological Distress in a Nonclinical College Sample (2012, positive): “In theory, the 2 processes are often conceptualized as adaptive regulation and coping processes that reflect greater psychological health.(3,4) Literature also supports the effectiveness of acceptance-based and mindfulness-based cognitive–behavioral therapies that are designed to promote greater wel”
- Understanding individual compassion in organizations: the role of appraisals and psychological flexibility (2011, positive): “…evidence for the positive impacts of psychological flexibility on work-related dependent variables, such as mental health (Flaxman & Bond, 2010a,b; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010), performance (Bond & Bunce, 2003), physical well-being (Donaldson-Feilder & Bond, 2004), a propensity to innovate (Bond &…”
- Post–traumatic Growth as Positive Personality Change: Evidence, Controversies and Future Directions (2014, background): “…(Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010), but it is conceptually related to the personality construct of ego-resiliency (Block & Kremen, 1996), defined as the dynamic ability to respond adaptively to the situational demands of daily life (Block & Block, 2006, p. 318; see also Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”
- Intra-individual variability and psychological flexibility: Affect and health in a National US sample (2017, background): “Empirical studies appear to disagree about the adaptiveness of within-person variability: IIV has been associated with poorer psychological and physical outcomes, whereas PF may be related to better psychological and physical health outcomes (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010; Röcke & Brose, 2013).”
- Examining mindfulness and psychological inflexibility within the framework of Big Five personality (2013, background): “…be a reflection of the assertion that in addition to distress and negative emotionalit y, psychological inflexibility, but not Neuroticism, reflects the way an individual responds to or is affected by negative emotionalit y and other private events, such as worries (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010 ).”
- Hope and emotional well-being: A six-year study to distinguish antecedents, correlates, and consequences (2015, background): “This second component of hope has explicit links theoretically to psychological flexibility (Bonanno, Papa, Lalande, Westphal, & Coifman, 2004; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”
- Mind full or mindful: a report on mindfulness and psychological health in healthy adolescents (2016, background): “Psychological inflexibility is considered an emotional vulnerability for many forms of psychopathology and has drawn increased attention from researchers (Chawla & Ostafin, 2007; Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, & Lilis, 2006; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).”