Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Board characteristics and company performance: Evidence from Nigeria (2014, background): “This finding is consistent with Amran (2010) and Ujunwa (2012) that directors with degree significantly affect firm performance.”
Board diversity and organizational valuation: unravelling the effects of ethnicity and gender (2013, background): “, 2006) and board structure (Swartz and Firer, 2005; Kyereboah-Coleman and Biekpe, 2006; Sunday, 2008; Ntim, 2011) on market valuation, studies examining the valuation implications of ethnic and gender diversity within organizational boards are rare (Lincoln and Adedoyin, 2012; Mahadeo et al., 2012;”
The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms (2014, neutral): “(Anderson et al., 2004; Ujunwa, 2012).”
Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India (2016, background): “Some studies (Kaymak & Bektas, 2008; Lin, 2011; Ujunwa, 2012) criticize the dual role of the CEO, as almost absolute decision making authority with one person might not be in the best interest of stakeholders.”
The Impact of Board Characteristics on the Financial Performance of Tanzanian Firms. (2018, methodology): “Corporate governance reforms, such as codes of corporate governance, guidelines, and regulations, aim to enhance the board’s effectiveness (Ujunwa, 2012).”