THE EFFECT OF MICROTIMING DEVIATIONS ON THE PERCEPTION OF GROOVE IN SHORT RHYTHMS

By Matthew E. P. Davies, Guy Madison, Pedro Silva, Fabien Gouyon. 2013

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ed5facc10bfafd2d994ea4f6ee1138f1f6baf95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Emery Schubert
2. Michael J. Hove
3. Jan Stupacher
4. Gary E. McPherson
5. P. Evans
6. Peter Miksza
7. Tuomas Eerola
8. E. G. Schellenberg

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Emery Schubert
2. Michael J. Hove
3. Jan Stupacher

In Signal Processing

1. Emery Schubert
2. Michael J. Hove
3. Jan Stupacher
4. Tuomas Eerola

Citations in the corpus

• The definition of a musician in music psychology: A literature review and the six-year rule (2018, background): “Although in the papers studied, these listeners were also identified as musicians, with “trained listeners” (Eitan, Ben-Haim, & Margulis, 2017) and “expert listeners” (Davies et al., 2013) having seven and 22.”
• Audio Features Underlying Perceived Groove and Sensorimotor Synchronization in Music (2016, background): “Of particular interest to studies of groove are measures that reflect the temporal structure of the music, such as the perceived beat or timing characteristics of event onsets that can support processes of sensorimotor entrainment (Madison et al, 2011; Davies et al., 2013).”