Psychopathy and Personality.

By Donald R. Lynam, Karen J. Derefinko. 2006

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55c46476addf53e38bc2ae999d846e1a1f452f9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Ashton
2. Kibeom Lee
3. B. Visser
4. Adrian Furnham
5. P. Jonason
6. S. Lilienfeld
7. D. Paulhus
8. J. Bourdage

Citations in the corpus

• Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness (2009, background): “Terms related to meanness include callousness (Frick et al., 1994), coldheartedness (Lilienfeld & Widows, 2005), and antagonism (Lynam & Derefinko, 2006).”
• Are psychopaths and heroes twigs off the same branch? Evidence from college, community, and presidential samples (2013, background): “…both correlate highly (rs between .5 and .6) with total scores on the PPI and the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP; Hare, Harpur, & Hemphill, 1989), and exhibit significant positive correlations with their respective Factor 1 and Factor 2 scores on the PPI and SRP (Lynam & Derefinko, 2006).”
• A meta‐analysis of psychopathy‐, antisocial PD‐ and FFM associations (2009, background): “Additionally, Lynam and colleagues (Lynam, 2002; Lynam & Derefinko, 2006) suggested that using the FFM to Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Eur.”
• The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review (2013, background): “Donald Lynam has argued that interpersonal antagonism is a better explanation (e.g., Lynam & Derefinko, 2005).”
• The Multidimensional Nature of Psychopathy: Five Recommendations for Research (2018, background): “Miller and Lynam (2015) went so far as to maintain that Bpsychopathy is personality^ (p. 225; see also Lynam and Derefinko 2006).”
• Sex, Power, and Money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility (2013, result): “One of the early studies showing the predictive usefulness of the HEXACOHonesty–Humility factor involved the construct of Likelihood to Sexually Harass (LSH; Pryor, 1987), which is measured by a scale assessing male respondents’ expressed willingness, in a series of hypothetical scenarios, to engage”