A Review of Undergraduate Mentoring Programs

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Can Peer Mentors Improve First-Year Experiences of University Students? (2017, methodology): “The current evaluation study is an attempt to remedy some of the methodological issues noted by (a) Crisp and Cruz (2009) in a review of college mentoring studies from 1990 to 2007 and (b) Gershenfeld (2014) in a review of college mentoring studies from 2008 to 2012.”
Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education (2016, background): “It is suggested, following a review of undergraduate mentoring programmes, that research on university mentoring programmes needs to focus on the types of training provided to mentees (Gershenfeld, 2014).”