Bycatch in the tuna purse-seine fisheries of the western Indian Ocean

By E. Romanov. 2002

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55ab7f4a2425973e50da9b8dea29b053eed6ab66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Movements and site fidelity of the giant manta ray, Manta birostris, in the Komodo Marine Park, Indonesia (2008, background): “Although not the target of large-scale Wsheries, giant mantas are captured incidentally and/or taken in regional Wsheries through much of their range (Garcia and Hall 1997; Alava et al. 2002; Dewar 2002; Romanov 2002; Fujita 2006; White et al. 2006).”
Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003-2007 period (2010, background): “These include vulnerable and sensitive species (i.e. displaying low fecundity or slow growth rate), and charismatic species, such as turtles, mammals, and sharks (Stretta et al. 1997; Romanov 2002, 2008; LennertCody et al. 2001; Minami et al. 2007).”
Characteristics of a manta ray Manta alfredi population off Maui, Hawaii, and implications for management (2011, background): “…ros tris may be targeted by large-scale directed fisheries, or succumb to bycatch in longline and tuna purse seine operations (Paulin et al. 1982, Romanov 2002), M. alfredi populations may be more vulnerable to nearshore anthropogenic impacts such as coastal development, storm water runoff,…”
Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean (2012, methodology): “Neither temporal nor spatial stratifications were considered here, and data were only stratified according to fishing mode, on the basis of prior analyses for similar or comparable fisheries that showed quantitative differences in accidental catch between FAD and FSC sets (Gaertner et al., 2002; Rom”
Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals (2014, unknown): “, 2009) and in specific contexts (Romanov, 2002; Rogan and Mackey, 2007).”
Scarring patterns and relative mortality rates of Indian Ocean whale sharks (2008, background): “Tuna purse-seine fisheries in the western Indian Ocean catch small numbers of whale sharks (Romanov, 1998), while gillnet fisheries also occasionally catch whale sharks (Stevens, 2007).”
Troubled waters: Threats and extinction risk of the sharks, rays and chimaeras of the Arabian Sea and adjacent waters (2018, background): “The introduction of large- scale tuna purse seine fisheries in 1982 also increased pressure on pelagic sharks, in particular those associated with fish aggregation devices (FADs) (Filmalter, Capello, Deneubourg, Cowley, & Dagorn, 2013; Romanov, 2002, 2008).”
Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? (2013, background): “However, even though by-catch at FADs may be quite small, the fact that ﬁshing on ﬂoat-ing objects is a part of the ﬂeet’s overall strategy results in an increase in by-catch for the purse seine ﬁshery as a whole (Romanov 2002).”
A review of marine mammal, sea turtle and seabird bycatch in USA fisheries and the role of policy in shaping management (2009, unknown): “, [18,64]).”
Assessing the size, growth rate and structure of a seasonal population of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus Smith 1828) using conventional tagging and photo identification (2007, unknown): “…need to surface and breathe, most population estimates of large migratory ﬁsh, particularly sharks, remain primarily based on catch-dependent data (Branstetter, 1987; Bonﬁl, 1997; Fairfax, 1998; Myers and Worm, 2003) or bycatch data (de Silva et al., 2001; Francis et al., 2001; Romanov, 2002).”
The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean (2014, background): “Majority of the non-target species caught incidentally around floating objects are small tunas and other bony fishes [7–8,20].”
Marine megafauna interactions with small-scale fisheries in the southwestern Indian Ocean: a review of status and challenges for research and management (2018, background): “There is a notable imbalance ([80% of peerreviewed papers) between studies focussing on elasmobranchs in the industrial and semi-industrial fisheries e.g. (Fennessy 1994; Huang and Liu 2010; Kiszka and van der Elst 2015; Romanov 2002) and the small-scale fisheries (Molina and Cooke 2012).”
Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies (2004, background): “For example, 42 and 45 different species of pelagic fish have been recorded in the by-catch of sets around logs and drifting FADs in the western Pacific (Hampton and Bailey, 1999) and Indian ocean fisheries (Romanov, 2002), respectively.”