Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean

By M. Amandé, E. Chassot, P. Chavance, H. Murua, A. D. Molina, N. Bez. 2012

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b68cfd85445620d6ac0c32d039f0373071b2f7a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Milner‐Gulland
2. E. Chassot
3. C. Mees
4. A. Fonteneau
5. L. Dagorn

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. Milner‐Gulland
2. E. Chassot
3. L. Dagorn

Citations in the corpus

• The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean (2014, background): “ghost fishing), although the extent of this mortality is not usually estimated [23].”
• Spatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: potential and perspectives (2014, background): “Reporting of bycatch rates by longliners is extremely limited worldwide (Lewison et al., 2004), and until recently only 5–6% of IO purse-seine fishing trips carried observers, making it difficult or impossible to assess the status and identify hotspots of many bycatch species (Amandè et al., 2012).”