How to Write a Systematic Review
By R. Wright, R. Brand, W. Dunn, K. Spindler. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2007
688 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/552d32f1bb9568228ac75d16b31d9eae210118f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Teaching personal and social responsibility model-based programmes in physical education (2016, methodology): “The following categories were defined a priori using the method suggested by Harris et al. (2014): authors; journal; year; study name; location; objectives; sample size; participants’ profiles; 58 European Physical Education Review 24(1) length of study; data sources; methodological analysis; and…”
- Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review (2013, background): “However, the effect of language bias has been shown to have a minimal impact on the conclusions of systematic reviews [47].”
- Motivational processes in Sport Education programs among high school students (2018, neutral): “Data extraction Information was extracted using content analysis of the articles based on a systematic review guideline (Harris et al., 2014).”
- A Review of Sustainable Consumption (2000 to 2020): What We Know and What We Need to Know (2020, neutral): “We followed the process suggested by Wright et al. (2007), Petticrew and Roberts (2008) and Quoquab and Mohammad (2020).”