What can biological barcoding do for marine biology?

By C. Schander, E. Willassen. 2005

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/550a89a9f040035dfe9c23629bb3195d8377b85f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

New insights into the phylogeny, systematics and DNA barcoding of Nemertea (2014, background): “However, among other factors, the functionality of DNA barcoding is contingent on two presumptions: the presence of a high-coverage barcode database, and the presence, within any given group of organisms, of a wide DNA barcoding gap – the difference between the highest intraspecific variation and th”
Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding (2005, background): “Such an approach has been particularly useful for marine organisms ( Shander & Willassen 2005 ), including fishes (Mason 2003; Ward et al. 2005), soil meiofauna (Blaxter et al .1 998, 2004), freshwater meiobenthos (Markmann & Tautz 2005) and even extinct birds (Lambert et al. 2005).”
DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation (2007, methodology): “It is possible to obtain sufficient DNA from larvae as small as ~ 1 mm in length for amplification of COI-5 (Baldwin et al. 1996; Hare et al. 2000; Schander and Willassen 2005; Pegg et al. 2006; Richardson et al. 2006; Webb et al. 2006).”
Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications (2009, background): “In addition, the difficulty to identify species can led to incomplete survey of the true fauna present in a given area (Tinti et al. 2003; Schander and Willassen 2005) or to misunderstand ecological interactions, such as marine bioinvasions (Bucciarelli et al. 2002).”
DNA Barcoding the Medusozoa using mtCOI (2010, background): “Further, we seek to verify that DNA barcodes can provide the means for a non-specialist to discriminate taxa that would otherwise be difficult if not impossible to identify (Savolainen et al., 2005, Schander and Willassen, 2005).”
DNA barcoding reveals new insights into the diversity of Antarctic species of Orchomene sensu lato (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Lysianassoidea) (2011, background): “…of the current biodiversity crisis and the declining number of taxonomists, several authors suggest the use of DNA barcoding to accelerate and simplify species identification (Hebert et al., 2003a,b; Blaxter, 2004; Janzen et al., 2005; Schander and Willassen, 2005; Schindel and Miller, 2005).”
DNA Barcodes for Marine Biodiversity: Moving Fast Forward? (2010, background): “biodiversity assessment, there is no wonder that marine faunal inventories usually fail to identify one third of specimens to the species level when using morphological methods [16].”
DNA barcoding of Arctic Ocean holozooplankton for species identification and recognition (2010, background): “This gene region has been shown to discriminate species throughout the animal kingdom, including birds (Hebert et al., 2004), fish (Ward et al., 2005), and invertebrates (e.g., Schander and Willassen, 2005 ).”
DNA barcodes for species identification of euphausiids (Euphausiacea, Crustacea) (2007, background): “…as DNA barcodes has proven useful for marine animal species, including copepods (Hill et al., 2001; Bucklin et al., 2003) and other crustaceans (Quan et al., 2001; Vainola et al., 2001; Porter et al., 2005), fish (Ward et al., 2005) and other groups (Knowlton, 2000; Schander and Willassen, 2005).”
Data quality, performance, and uncertainty in taxonomic identification for biological assessments (2008, background): “One of these factors is poor sample condition (New 1996, Stribling et al. 2003, Ball et al. 2005, Schander and Willassen 2005, Cuffney et al. 2007).”
The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. (2005, background): “DNA barcoding has no way to overcome this common phenomenon—unless of course it brings in other genes and morphological characters and becomes integrative taxonomy! This change indeed has been suggested by recent, moderate supporters of barcoding (e.g., Schander and Willassen, 2005; D. Schindel, C”