Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30 m Shear Wave Velocity

By Yoojoong Choi, J. Stewart. 2005

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54fee385df84f892cbf04c6bebcac83e9fc0b597

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. D. Boore
2. K. Campbell
3. Y. Bozorgnia
4. N. Abrahamson
5. S. Akkar
6. E. Thompson
7. J. Stewart
8. B. Chiou

In Geophysics

1. D. Boore
2. K. Campbell
3. Y. Bozorgnia
4. N. Abrahamson
5. E. Thompson
6. S. Akkar
7. J. Stewart
8. B. Chiou

Citations in the corpus

• A Local Ground-Motion Predictive Model for Turkey, and Its Comparison with Other Regional and Global Ground-Motion Models (2010, methodology): “The original form of this model is proposed by Choi and Stewart (2005).”
• An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra (2008, background): “The functional form of Equation 10 is able to represent other models of nonlinear site response, such as that developed by Choi and Stewart (2005) as well as the results of site response analyses conducted for the NGA project by Walling et al. (2008).”
• NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes (2014, background): “We attribute the lower " values for soft sites to nonlinear site response, which amplifies weak motions and de-amplifies strong motions, thus reducing " relative to underlying reference site conditions (Choi and Stewart, 2005).”
• Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations (2008, unknown): “EQID YEAR Earthquake Name Mag AS08 BA08 CB08 CY08 I08 164 2001 Gulf of California 5.70 11 11 11 165 2002 CA/Baja Border Area 5.31 9 9 9 6 166 2002 Gilroy 4.90 34 34 34 18 10 167 2002 Yorba Linda 4.27 12 12 12 12 Nenana Mountain, 1 168 2002 Alaska 6.70 5 33 5 169 2002 Denali, Alaska 7.90 9 23 9 4 170”
• Selection of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Global Earthquake Model (2015, methodology): “When the BC model is used, a site amplification function can be applied, which was adopted from an empirical study of site amplification for active crustal regions (Choi and Stewart, 2005).”
• Regional Correlations of VS30 and Velocities Averaged Over Depths Less Than and Greater Than 30 Meters (2011, methodology): “Figure 7 also shows the ratio of predicted response spectra using the linear amplification given by equation (4), with bLIN taken from Boore and Atkinson (2008, table 3, which are modified from Choi and Stewart, 2005).”