A Local Ground-Motion Predictive Model for Turkey, and Its Comparison with Other Regional and Global Ground-Motion Models

By S. Akkar, Z. Çağnan. 2010

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a80d840aa357b5df8152d77b006f75423fa544f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Ö. Kale
2. Dino Bindi
3. R. Paolucci
4. S. Akkar
5. J. Bommer
6. C. Cauzzi
7. E. Faccioli
8. D. Boore

In Geophysics

1. Ö. Kale
2. Dino Bindi
3. R. Paolucci
4. S. Akkar
5. C. Cauzzi
6. E. Faccioli
7. J. Bommer
8. D. Boore

Citations in the corpus

• Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database (2011, methodology): “After some trial regressions and after Boore and Atkinson (2008), the following variables have been fixed: Rref = 1 km;Mref = 5;Mh = 6.”
• A New Procedure for Selecting and Ranking Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs): The Euclidean Distance-Based Ranking (EDR) Method (2013, methodology): “The catalog (metadata) information of the recordings in the database is retrieved from sources of Erdik et al. (2003), Harmandar (2009), Akkar et al. (2010), and Sandıkkaya et al. (2010), and EMME and SHARE progress reports (2011) at http://emme‑gem.org/, and www.share-eu.org/, respectively (all…”