Voluntary Eco-Labeling and the Price Premium

By R. Sedjo, S. Swallow. Land Economics, 2002

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Revised Conceptual Framework for Payments for Environmental Services (2009, background): “We do not consider certification or ecolabeling to constitute PES approaches, as there is no assured relationship between certification and a positive incentive (Sedjo and Swallow 2002).”
Willingness to pay for eco-labelled wood furniture: Choice-based conjoint analysis versus open-ended contingent valuation (2007, background): “(Sedjo and Swallow, 2002).”
Label Performance and the Willingness to Pay for Fair Trade Coffee: A Cross- National Perspective (2008, unknown): “For example, Sirieix and Schaer (1999) surveyed French and German consumers about the image of organic agriculture in the respective countries.”
A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries (2016, background): “Sedjo & Swallow (2002) analyzed whether a consumer’s willingness to pay a premium for certified wood is a sufficient condition for a price premium in the market.”
A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Contingent Ranking Experiment (2006, background): “, Sedjo and Swallow, 2000; Moon et al., 2002; Johnston et al., 2001; Loureiro, McCluskey, and Mittelhammer, 2001; Blend and van Ravenswaay, 1999; Nimon and Beghin, 1999). In the case of seafood markets, ecolabels provide market-based incentives for sustainable fishery management, assuming consumers ”