Modern theories of justice

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability (2002, background): “Instead, society should be concerned with the distribution of what he calls 9See Arrow (1977), Kaneko (1984), Broome (1993), Roberts (1995), Kolm (1996a) and Suzumura (1996).”
Fair Allocation Rules (2011, background): “If for each i ∈ N , Gi = N and Λi = ∆ N , then the requirement is that each agent should find his bundle at least as desirable as any point in the convex hull of all assigned bundles (Kolm, 1996).18 Strictly envy-free allocations are also obtained as a special case.”
Compensation and responsibility (2011, background): “77More recent discussions of the extended insurance scheme can be found in Kolm (1996b, 1998), Roemer (1996, 2002a), Fleurbaey (2002), Dworkin (2002).”
Measuring Unfair (in) Equality (2008, background): “Finally, another prominent responsibility-sensitive fairness principle is the conditional egalitarian fairness principle (Kolm, 1996), which defines the fair income of individual i as given by zCEi = f x R i ; x NR i −f x~R; xNRi + CCE; ð10Þ where x~R is the reference responsibility vector and CCE…”
Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice (2011, background): “In this context Ebert (2009) discussed a “principle of concentration” (that was originally introduced by Kolm, 1996), and Magdalou and Moyes (2009) reinterpreted the idea of relative deprivation.”