Compensation and responsibility

By Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet. 2011

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9af7a5f9659217add3d652b73ab0251391b8a00b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Daniele Checchi
2. V. Peragine
3. John E. Roemer
4. Alain Trannoy
5. E. Thorbecke
6. F. Waltenberg
7. Luis F. Gamboa
8. Chutatong Charumilind

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Daniele Checchi
2. V. Peragine

Citations in the corpus

• WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY (2015, unknown): “It turns out that methods for purging inequality from the effects of a factor while holding others constant as in Almås and Mogstad (2012) have been the focus of the literature on responsibility and compensation (Fleurbaey and Maniquet 2010).”
• Inequality of opportunity in Italy (2010, background): “This ethical tension has been explored in depth by Fleurbaey [16] and Fleurbaey and Maniquet [18] in the context of fair division models and by Fleurbaey [17] in the context of welfare criteria, as Roemer [30], Van de gaer [32] and Peragine [25] criteria.”
• Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement (2016, unknown): “The trade-off between reward and compensation for the four allocation rules discussed here is summarized in table 4, from Fleurbaey and Maniquet (2011b).”