Measuring Unfair (in) Equality

By Ingvild Almås, Alexander W. Cappelen, J. Lind, Erik Ø. Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden. 2008

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac7c3f11fcf02983b5e962be278adcf72ddc08c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Francisco H. G. Ferreira
2. V. Peragine
3. P. Brunori

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Francisco H. G. Ferreira
2. V. Peragine
3. P. Brunori
4. Alain Trannoy
5. Gaston Yalonetzky
6. Gustavo A. Marrero
7. John E. Roemer
8. F. Waltenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement (2016, unknown): “Three thorough empirical studies have studied EOp for income in Scandinavia: Aaberge, Mogstad, and Peragine (2011) and Almås et al. (2011) for Norway, and Björklund, Jantti, and Roemer (2012) for”
• Inequality of Opportunity, Income Inequality and Economic Mobility: Some International Comparisons (2013, background): “of Generational Earnings Mobility”, IZA DP No. 1993.”
• WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY (2015, unknown): “…the age-adjustment procedures in wealth inequality bear resemblance to the measures of (in-)equality of opportunity that attempt to disentangle “fair” and “unfair” inequalities attributable to effort, luck or individual a priori circumstances (Almås et al. 2011, Roemer and Trannoy 2015).”