Institutions and economic performance: A meta-regression analysis

By A. Efendic, G. Pugh, N. Adnett. 2011

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54af177248c7a7486ec52bee15c4bc547e33ccf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. R. Horvath
2. Nikos Benos
3. Stefania Zotou
4. Tomáš Havránek
5. A. Zeynalov
6. S. Law
7. Colin Williams

In Information Systems

1. Nikos Benos
2. Stefania Zotou
3. Tomáš Havránek
4. R. Horvath
5. A. Zeynalov
6. Normaz Wana Ismail
7. S. Law
8. Thong Cheen Lim

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nikos Benos
2. Stefania Zotou
3. Tomáš Havránek
4. R. Horvath
5. A. Zeynalov
6. A. Efendic
7. Normaz Wana Ismail
8. S. Law

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the relationship between marginalization and participation in undeclared work: lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina (2021, background): “On the one hand, reliance on informal institutions (A. Efendic et al. 2011) and the use of informal networking are viewed as widespread practices in this region (Ledeneva and Efendic 2021).”
• Education and Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis (2014, methodology): “We follow Efendic et al (2011) and use the Funnel Assymetry Test (FAT) to formally test for the presence of publication bias.”
• Institutions and economic development: A Granger causality analysis of panel data evidence (2013, background): “…and Levine (2003), Dollar and Kraay (2003), Rodrik et al. (2004), Butkiewicz and Yanikkaya (2006), Aixala and Fabro (2007, 2008), Lee and Kim (2009), Huynh and Jacho-Chavez (2009), Pääkkönen (2010), Haggard and Tiede (2011), Efendic et al. (2011), Peyton and Belasen (2012) and Neyapti (2012).”
• Monopsony in Labor Markets: A Meta-Analysis (2020, unknown): “Nevertheless, the literature has converged on the ‘‘publication bias’’ term (e.g., Card and Krueger 1995; Ashenfelter, Harmon, and Oosterbeek 1999; Stanley 2001; Efendic, Pugh, and Adnett 2011; Rusnak, Havranek, and Horvath 2013; Havranek 2015); we also use it for consistency.”
• Natural Resources and Economic Growth : A Meta-Analysis (2016, methodology): “Following several previous meta-analyses (Doucouliagos, 2005; Efendic et al., 2011; Valickova et al., 2015), for the summary statistic we use the partial correlation coefficient (PCC), which can be derived as: PCCis = tis √ tis + dfis , (2)”