Natural Resources and Economic Growth : A Meta-Analysis

By Tomáš Havránek, R. Horvath, A. Zeynalov. 2016

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Development, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7451ef4a3b0525c0a0e40ec6420a6844b32dce63

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. E. Achuo
2. Tii N. Nchofoung
3. Simplice A. Asongu

In Development

1. Simplice A. Asongu
2. Vanessa S. Tchamyou
3. Jacinta C. Nwachukwu
4. Nicholas M. Odhiambo

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Achuo
2. Tii N. Nchofoung
3. Simplice A. Asongu
4. Vanessa S. Tchamyou
5. Jacinta C. Nwachukwu
6. Nicholas M. Odhiambo

Citations in the corpus

• Monopsony in Labor Markets: A Meta-Analysis (2020, neutral): “…with more complex methods (such as an identification strategy) may be less precise—not because these estimates are 11This variable is common in the meta-analyses literature, see Havranek (2015), Havranek, Horvath, and Zeynalov (2016), Card, Kluve, et al. (2018), Havranek and Sokolova (2020).”
• Resource rents and inclusive human development in developing countries (2021, background): “Recently, Havranek et al. (2016) revealed that while approximately 20% and 40% of empirical studies have respectively found a positive and negative effect, about 40% of studies do not find any effect.”