Evaluating the relationship between marginalization and participation in undeclared work: lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina
By Colin Williams, A. Efendic. 2021
10 citations recorded by the source corpus.
ABSTRACT This paper tests competing hypotheses on the relationship between marginalization and participation in undeclared work. The ‘marginalization’ thesis views undeclared work as conducted primarily by marginalized populations among which young, unemployed and economically fragile people dominate. A competing ‘reinforcement’ thesis argues that undeclared work is conducted disproportionately by those in declared jobs and thus that the undeclared economy reinforces, rather than reduces, the inequalities produced by the declared economy. To evaluate who engages in undeclared work and to test these competing theses, data is reported from a 2015 survey of 6,021 randomly selected adult respondents in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Reporting the marginal effects of a Probit regression analysis, the finding is that marginalized groups (the unemployed, younger age groups, those with fewer years in formal education, lower-income households, rural populations and those from poorer regions) are all significantly more likely to participate in undeclared work. The implications for theory and policy are discussed, along with the limitations of the study and future research required.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Economics & Operations Research, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Safety Research
- Irene Solaiman
- Marie-Therese Png
- Zeerak Talat
- Yacine Jernite
- Alexandra Sasha Luccioni
- Su Lin Blodgett
- Margaret Mitchell
- Sara Hooker
In Economics & Operations Research
In Social Sciences & Humanities
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “Evaluating marginalization will depend on context, and should account for marginalization when work by marginalized populations is less visible or uncredited [264].”