Peer-Induced Fairness in Games
By Teck-Hua Ho, Xuanming Su. 2009
227 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54a8a77fe85bd4bb5b6e0e7e232b507c37da01fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Economics and Econometrics
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Newsvendor model for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns (2014, background): “Ho and Su (2009) analyze two independent ultimatum games played sequentially by a leader and two followers by considering peer-induced fairness between followers and distributional fairness between the leader and followers.”
- First Step in Social Media: Measuring the Influence of Online Management Responses on Customer Satisfaction (2014, background): “We show the result can be explained by a new type of fairness concern — peer-induced fairness (Ho and Su 2009) — due to the public nature of online management responses.”
- Distributional and Peer‐Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design (2013, background): “By doing so, Retailer 2 effectively changes the current game setup into the one studied by Ho and Su (2009), where the second retailer is always treated better.”
- Negative Reviews, Positive Impact: Consumer Empathetic Responding to Unfair Word of Mouth (2020, background): “…the perspective of the individual undergoing the exchange experience; Bagozzi 1974) and has explored social comparisons in price fairness (Cox 2001; Ho and Su 2009; Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler 1986, 1990) and fair treatment in service recovery (e.g., Bies and Shapiro 1988; Clemmer 1993; Folger…”
- The Impact of Consumer Fairness Seeking on Distribution Channel Selection: Direct Selling vs. Agent Selling (2018, background): “One strand of literature studies peer-induced fairness, where agents’ perception of fairness is closely related to the peers’ payoffs (Campbell 1999, Chen and Cui 2013, Ho and Su 2009, Kukar-Kinney et al. 2007).”