Demographic Approach to Releasing Adults versus Young in Reintroductions

By François Sarrazin, Stéphane Legendre. 2000

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54a64856fac38e40ec7705dcdecbd4ef037e2556

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Perturbation analysis of nonlinear matrix population models (2008, background): “Subsidized models have been used to analyze conservation programs in which captive-reared animals are released into a wild or reestablished population (Sarrazin and Legendre 2000).”
Linking Wild and Captive Populations to Maximize Species Persistence: Optimal Translocation Strategies (2004, background): “…to monitoring and the allocation of funds between prerelease and release activities (Haight et al. 2000); the age structure of founder animals (Sarrazin & Legendre 2000); the optimal size of founder populations and the necessary degree of predator control (Sinclair et al. 1998); and the best…”
No place like home: an experimental comparison of reintroduction strategies using snakes (2010, methodology): “…of release cohorts, the timing of their release, and use of temporary enclosures to acclimate and familiarize animals to site conditions are some examples of methods that have proven useful (Bright & Morris 1994; Sarrazin & Legendre 2000; Tuberville et al. 2005; Griffiths & Pavajeau 2008).”
Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology (2007, background): “Many workers have reported that mortality is highest immediately following release (Brittas et al., 1992; Sjöåsen, 1996; Castro et al., 1998; Kenward and Hodder, 1998; Sarrazin and Legendre, 2000).”
When to end releases in reintroduction programmes: demographic rates and population viability analysis of bearded vultures in the Alps (2009, background): “Moreover, data from naturally born individuals would be required to test if the release has costs in terms of survival, as observed in griffon vultures Gyps fulvus Hablizl ( Sarrazin & Legendre 2000; Le Gouar et al. 2008).”
Preserving genetic diversity in threatened species reintroductions: how many individuals should be released? (2011, background): “…and genetic consequences of varying sex and age composition of release groups with respect to detrimental effects of inbreeding depression (e.g. Sarrazin & Legendre, 2000; Robert et al., 2004; Robert, Couvet & Sarrazin, 2007), but there are surprisingly no general rules available for…”
Maximizing re-introduction success: Assessing the immediate cost of release in a threatened waterfowl (2009, methodology): “Short-term post-release survival is thus a crucial parameter for the success of projects, and depends on many factors, such as the age of individuals (Sarrazin and Legendre, 2000), the release method (Eastridge and Clark, 2001; Green et al.”
Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive‐bred swift fox (Vulpes velox) (2004, background): “Nevertheless, in many reintroduction programmes the selection of release candidates is often based solely on fulfilment of age, sex and health criteria (Yalden, 1993; Sarrazin & Legendre, 2000).”
Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects (2010, background): “…annually) or more intensively (e.g., estimating demographic rates) has provided numerous insights into factors affecting the success of reintroductions, for example, for European griffon vultures Gyps fulvus (Sarrazin & Legendre 2000) or New Zealand hihi Notiomystis cincta (Armstrong et al. 2007).”
Lynx reintroductions in fragmented landscapes of Germany : Projects with a future or misunderstood wildlife conservation? (2005, background): “Due to a change in public attitudes towards wildlife in the mid-20th century, species reintroductions have been increasingly considered (Leaper et al., 1999; South et al., 2000; Sarrazin and Legendre, 2000; Breitenmoser et al., 2001; O Toole et al., 2002).”