Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects

By W. J. Sutherland, D. Armstrong, Stuart H. M. Butchart, J. Earnhardt, J. Ewen, Ian G. Jamieson, Carl G. Jones, Rebecca Lee, P. Newbery, James D. Nichols and 5 more. 2010

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d0c9e31f946fd625476d65129fbd300ca62fdb2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. M. Saint-Jalme
2. François Sarrazin
3. Christian Kerbiriou
4. B. Colas
5. A. Robert
6. J. Mihoub
7. I. Guigon
8. Ian G. Jamieson

In Ecology

1. Christian Kerbiriou
2. M. Saint-Jalme
3. B. Colas
4. J. Mihoub
5. I. Guigon
6. François Sarrazin
7. Lisa N. Tracy
8. A. Robert

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Saint-Jalme
2. François Sarrazin
3. Christian Kerbiriou
4. B. Colas
5. A. Robert
6. M. Efford
7. J. Mihoub
8. I. Guigon

Citations in the corpus

• Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, background): “However, there are still no general and broadly accepted success criteria (Sarrazin & Barbault, 1996; Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2000; Sutherland et al., 2010).”
• Preserving genetic diversity in threatened species reintroductions: how many individuals should be released? (2011, background): “Animal Conservation c 2011 The Zoological Society of London444 that reintroductions and subsequent monitoring needs to be resourced adequately (Sarrazin & Barbault, 1996; Sutherland et al., 2010).”