When to end releases in reintroduction programmes: demographic rates and population viability analysis of bearded vultures in the Alps

By Michael Schaub, R. Zink, H. Beissmann, François Sarrazin, R. Arlettaz. 2009

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b0f498bd4a01a13deff30eed56f8a9cb8e990c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Christian Kerbiriou
2. M. Saint-Jalme
3. B. Colas
4. J. Mihoub
5. I. Guigon
6. François Sarrazin
7. A. Robert

Citations in the corpus

• Animal Translocations: What are they and why do we do them? (2012, unknown): “…et al., 1989; Seddon, 1999; Wolf et al., 1996, 1998), and there is now widespread use of population modelling to set re-establishment goals, to define optimal reintroduction strategies and to assess population persistence (Armstrong et al., 2002, 2006; Rout et al., 2009; Schaub et al., 2009).”
• Captive breeding genetics and reintroduction success (2009, background): “, 2005), falconiformes (Schaub et al., 2009), ungulates (King and Gurnell, 2005) or carnivores (Jule et al.”
• Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, background): “Most authors consider that reintroduction programs should aim at establishing viable populations (Armstrong & Seddon, 2008; Schaub et al., 2009; IUCN/SSC, 2013).”