The effectiveness of laws against bribery abroad

By Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra. 2008

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5495aa27ad792580e8a7a4b857363ffb44c554eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Waqar Ameer
2. Mihaela Peres
3. Helian Xu
4. Sorin M. S. Krammer
5. H. Thein
6. K. Meyer
7. Mike W. Peng
8. Ans Kolk

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Waqar Ameer
2. Sorin M. S. Krammer
3. Mihaela Peres
4. Helian Xu
5. H. Thein
6. K. Meyer
7. Alfredo Jiménez

Citations in the corpus

• Does bribery help or hurt firm growth around the world? (2011, unknown): “…institutions may push small firms to engage in forced bribery, large firms with more resources in their " deep pocket " and more established connections with government officials are more likely to strategically engage in bribery to gain favorable treatment (Dieleman & Sachs, 2008).”
• Greasing the Wheels of Change: Bribery, Institutions, and New Product Introductions in Emerging Markets (2019, background): “…designed to limit the use of public power for private gain, covering a wide range of illegal behavior from “petty” (i.e., frequent small payments for small favors) to “grand” (i.e., large sums of money for lucrative, sizeable projects) corruption cases (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2008; Kaufmann et al., 2009).”
• Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries (2008, unknown): “They are even constrained in bribing officials abroad because there are laws in their home country that explicitly forbid them from giving bribes to gain business abroad (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2008b).”
• Business under adverse home country institutions: The case of international sanctions against Myanmar (2020, background): “…extend the scope of their laws extraterritorially to regulate activities of their citizens or businesses elsewhere, as in the case of anti-corruption legislation in OECD countries: companies and individuals can be prosecuted in their home country for bribes paid abroad (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2008).”
• The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries (2018, background): “Lower corruption index scores in the host country have positive associations with investment inflows, as perceived corruption levels would be lower (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2006, 2008; Wei, 2000).”