Characterizing size-dependent effective elastic modulus of silicon nanocantilevers using electrostatic pull-in instability

By H. Sadeghian, C. K. Yang, J. Goosen, E. V. D. Drift, A. Bossche, P. French, Fred van Keulen. 2009

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5484a08a404fd7c4180197eb8c1ab0930cae62fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Stephan Sylvest Keller
2. Silvan Schmid
3. Maria Tenje
4. Søren Dohn
5. S. Forest
6. Nicolás Cordero
7. Anja Boisen
8. E. Busso

In Biomedical Engineering

1. E. Busso
2. Nicolás Cordero
3. S. Forest
4. Leong Hien Poh
5. Elias C. Aifantis
6. Luca Placidi
7. Patrizio Neff
8. Fadi Aldakheel

Citations in the corpus

• Cantilever-like micromechanical sensors (2011, methodology): “The same model of Eeff has also been used by Sadeghian et al to describe Young’s modulus reduction for silicon nanocantilevers [254].”
• Second strain gradient elasticity of nano-objects (2016, methodology): “In particular, their size-dependent elastic properties are studied experimentally using various methods (see, for example, Agrawal et al., 2008; McDowell et al., 2008; Sadeghian et al., 2009).”
• Buckling-induced smart applications: recent advances and trends (2015, unknown): “For example, Sadeghian et al [175] experi-”
• What is the Young's Modulus of Silicon? (2010, unknown): “See, for example, [19]–[21].”