Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Farmer preferences for milpa diversity and genetically modified maize in Mexico: a latent class approach (2007, unknown): “Scarpa et al. (2003a) and Ruto (2005) employed this model to value livestock attributes, whereas Hu et al. (2004) and Kontoleon and Yabe (2006) used it to investigate consumer preferences for GM food.”
Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution (2016, methodology): “The unconditional choice probability is calculated as shown in (9): Pji ¼ Xs s¼1 Ps YTðnÞ tðnÞ Pjitjs ð9Þ After the model is estimated, probabilities are obtained for each individual latent segment (Hu et al., 2004): PPðsÞ ¼ Ps QTðnÞ tðnÞ PjitPs s¼1Ps QTðnÞ tðnÞ Pjitjs ð10Þ”
Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, background): “Consumer attitudes to GMOs in food production have been widely studied (e.g. Bredahl, 2001; Burton et al., 2001; Grunert et al., 2003; Scholderer and Frewer, 2003; Frewer et al., 2004; Hu et al., 2004).”
Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences (2005, methodology): “…economics include a small number of papers in which authors report on the use of the technique with stated-preference and attitudinal data (Boxall and Adamovicz 2002; Scarpa, Willis, and Acutt 2003; Morey, Thacher, and Breffle 2004; Menzel and Scarpa 2004; Hu et al. 2004; Scarpa et al. 2005).”