Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics

By Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh. 2001

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53efb02854c4f6cbd9c6787e596280555e542ebd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Gowdy
2. L. Illge
3. Inge Røpke
4. Reimund Schwarze
5. J. Erickson
6. C. Spash
7. U. Pascual
8. G. Wegner

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. J. Gowdy
2. L. Illge
3. Inge Røpke
4. Reimund Schwarze
5. J. Erickson
6. C. Spash

Citations in the corpus

• Green economy and related concepts: An overview (2016, unknown): “…or ecological indicators (e.g., material input per service unit, the ecological footprint, and the critical natural capital) based on the concept of dematerialization and the conservation of non-substitutable natural capital are developed (Ekins et al., 2003; Farley, 2008; van den Bergh, 2001).”
• The approach of ecological economics (2005, background): “van den Bergh, Peter Brown, Raluca Iorgulescu, Melinda Kane, Richard Norgaard, Frank Müller, Sarah Parrales, John Proops, Irmi Seidl and Barry Solomon. 1 There is now a large literature on the history and approach of ecological economics. We have especially benefited from the contributions of van de”
• Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics (2007, unknown): “Ecological economics, next to being a platform for multidisciplinary research, has tried to accommodate the various critiques and offer viable alternatives (van den Bergh, 2001).”
• The early history of modern ecological economics (2004, background): “ces for the Future published the much cited Scarcity and Growth ( Barnett and Morse, 1963 ) in 1963, and in the following years the literature on the optimal use of renewable and non-renewable resources, common property problems, etc.”
• A Matter of Opinion : How Ecological and Neoclassical Environmental Economists Think about Sustainability and Economics (2006, background): “…differences related to the scientific concept of economics (e.g., Pearce 1987, Functowicz und Ravetz 1990, Klaasen und Opschoor 1991, Söderbaum 1992, Costanza 1993, van den Bergh 2000) and different recommendations for sustainability policy (e.g., Norton et al. 1998, van den Bergh et al. 2000).”