The early history of modern ecological economics

By Inge Røpke. 2004

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1ae69455a7c2f14ea7b803e44e91eea430d239f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
2. C. Spash
3. Kathryn Haynes
4. J. Martínez-Alier
5. C. Montes
6. Keith R. Skene
7. A. Murray
8. R.W.J. de Groot

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. C. Spash
2. Kathryn Haynes
3. J. Martínez-Alier
4. Keith R. Skene
5. A. Murray
6. A. Doyon
7. Kathleen Bolger
8. Piero Morseletto

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
2. C. Spash
3. J. Martínez-Alier
4. Keith R. Skene

Citations in the corpus

• The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “This turning point in relation to pre-classical economic thinking is clearly reflected in Adam Smith's 1776 Wealth of Nations, whose introduction states that the wealth of a particular society is the result of the amount of labor it embodies (Smith (1976), 1909).”
• Environmental Justice and Economic Degrowth: An Alliance between Two Movements (2012, background): “Ecological economics is a transdisciplinary field born in the 1980s (Costanza 1991, 1996; Ropke 2004; Martı́nez-Alier and Ropke 2008; Spash 2009) from a”
• The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “Intrepid ecologists and other natural scientists concerned by environmental degradation could see the need to connect with the social sciences even if this made them unpopular in their own fields (Røpke, 2004).”
• Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future (2011, background): “In an in-depth study, involving interviews with several noted ecological economists, Røpke (2004, 2005) found the international movement started by forming an uneasy alliance of divergent ecological and economic opinions on the basis of some very broad common concerns.”
• The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context (2015, background): “…is that it has largely emerged from legislation (at least in the Chinese context), rather than from a group of academics who have split from one field and have started a new one (exemplified by the emergence of Ecological Economics from Environmental Economics, as described by Røpke (2004; 2005)).”