The approach of ecological economics
By J. Gowdy, J. Erickson. 2005
255 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b5115fe64005e420bc67d9e53385c47cb74d60c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- J. Gowdy
- C. Spash
- C. Montes
- R. Norgaard
- R.W.J. de Groot
- L. Venkatachalam
- P. Lomas
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- J. Gowdy
- C. Spash
- C. Montes
- R.W.J. de Groot
- P. Lomas
- R. Norgaard
- L. Venkatachalam
Citations in the corpus
- The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “It is patent, however, that both approaches differ significantly in the qualitative framework within which they operate (Costanza, 1991; Ozkaynak et al., 2002; Gowdy and Erickson, 2005).”
- A participatory systems approach to modeling social, economic, and ecological components of bioenergy (2007, background): “One of the greatest advantages of MCA is its ability to include qualitative information and restrain from unifying units (Gowdy and Erickson, 2005).”
- Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “As a result, “neoclassical economics continues to offer bad advice in dealing with some of the most pressing environmental and social issues faced in the twenty-first century, including income disparity, global climate change, and biodiversity loss” (Gowdy and Erickson, 2005).”
- The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “Ecological economics is placed within the context of heterodox economic schools of thought (Gowdy and Erickson, 2005b; Spash, 2011a; Spash and Ryan, 2012) and the discontent with the orthodoxy is consistent with calls for a revolution in economic theory (Gowdy and Erickson, 2005a) or a paradigm…”
- Behavioral economics for environmental policy (2008, background): “…environmental and ecological economists have already taken initiative to use alternativemodels of rationality in their analyses related to environmental policy (e.g. Gowdy, in press; Gowdy, 2007; Gowdy and Erickson, 2005; Howarth, in press; Howarth, 2006; Howarth, 2003; van den Bergh et al., 2000).”
- Bridging ecological and social systems coevolution: A review and proposal (2010, background): “At the micro level, Gowdy and Erickson (2005) and Gowdy (2007) show how many new experimental and empirical results coming from psychology, game theory, sociology, and other related fields conflict with Walrasian tenets.”