Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development

By Michael Cole, Yrjö Engeström. 2007

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53a9385dfbd43b7fcd07affc10a5470dc2f0db01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Danny C. Martinez
2. Zitlali Morales
3. William R. Penuel
4. Kris D. Gutiérrez
5. L. Shepard

In Human Factors and Ergonomics

1. Danny C. Martinez
2. Zitlali Morales
3. William R. Penuel
4. Kris D. Gutiérrez

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Danny C. Martinez
2. Zitlali Morales
3. William R. Penuel
4. Kris D. Gutiérrez

Citations in the corpus

• Relevance to Practice as a Criterion for Rigor (2014, background): “The “change laboratory,” for example, involves the collaboration of practitioners and researchers around an important and consequential problem of practice within an existing activity system (Cole & Engeström, 2006; Engeström, 2008; Engeström, Virkkunen, Helle, Pihlaja, & Poikela, 1996).”
• Re-mediating Literacy: Culture, Difference, and Learning for Students From Nondominant Communities (2009, methodology): “(p. 5) In this work, change laboratories create “temporary activity systems that are set up within existing organizations (e.g., hospitals, schools, factories, and banks)” (Cole & Engeström, 2007, p. 504).”