Normality and Trust in Goffman's Theory of Interaction Order*
By B. Misztal. 2001
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/536ab7b0d6b8cc6746ec59d6a8883c8f09fccde3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Trusting organizations: The institutionalization of trust in interorganizational relationships (2012, background): “The same is true of system trust: it is not just the more global assumptions of familiarity or ‘situational normality’ (Luhmann, 1988; Misztal, 2001), but also the fact that the respective social system or subsystem is trusted that can act as a reassuring and trust-facilitating background…”
- Consumer trust in different food provisioning schemes: evidence from Beijing, China (2016, background): “Trust reduces complexity in everyday life (Luhmann, 1991) and is a lubricant for cooperative behaviour (Misztal, 2001).”
- Enterprise Ritual: A Theory of Entrepreneurial Emotion and Exchange (2008, unknown): “In conjunction with such knowledge, membership rituals, as has already been suggested, provide a basis for shared trust (Misztal, 2001).”
- Cannabis normalization and stigma: Contemporary practices of moral regulation (2011, background): “For Goffman, personal identity resides within the cracks: in the various adjustments, or ways of making out (or getting on with it), he sees as integral to construction of the self, and to the sense that one’s own life is normal (Misztal, 2001).”