Variable flowering phenology and pollinator use in a community suggest future phenological mismatch

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climatic Risk and Distribution Atlas of European Bumblebees (2015, background): “The resulting effects could be dramatic for both plants and pollinators (e.g. Kudo & Ida, 2013; Petanidou et al., 2014), even if several empirical studies suggest that the large plant and insect biodiversity could mitigate the expected dramatic consequences (e.”
Linking plant phenology to conservation biology (2016, background): “Environmental changes that cause some level of mismatch between plants and pollinators can reduce pollination services (Petanidou et al., 2014) and, consequently, seedproduction (Satake et al., 2013), affecting the dynamics of plant and animal populations (Fig.”
Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle (2020, background): “This could potentially impact upon moth larvae that consume flowers and seeds (Pettersson, 1991), as well as creating a mismatch between the phenology of flower-visiting adults and their nectar sources (Petanidou et al., 2014; Macgregor et al., 2015).”