Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects
By Daren C. Brabham. 2009
693 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52b39b5414001c17afbe8ef980b6702618079265
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara
- Sascha Kraus
- Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao
- Enrique Estellés Arolas
- Taewoo Nam
- Alexander Brem
- Qinghua Zhu
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara
- Sascha Kraus
- Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao
- Enrique Estellés Arolas
- Taewoo Nam
- Alexander Brem
- Qinghua Zhu
- Robert Wilhelm Siegfried Ruhlandt
Citations in the corpus
- City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities (2016, neutral): “crowdsourcing in urban planning, see [152]).”
- Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition (2012, background): “Moreover, the theoretical knowledge base is still not solid, being developed with works like Brabham’s, in which he defines crowdsourcing [4] and creates a typology of it [5]; Vukovic’s, in which she makes a general overview of various characteristics of crowdsourcing including the kind of crowd tha”
- Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction (2012, background): “…et al. 2008; Eckert et al. 2010; Franklin et al. 2011; Kittur et al. 2008; Marcus et al. 2011), cataloging (Holley 2009), and transportation plan (Brabham 2009), The above examination leads us to conclude that crowd-sourcing applications can be better understood by examining both contexts and…”
- Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, neutral): “…is also in step with the literature on open innovation: idea competitions are a core practice in open innovation (Leimeister, Huber, Bretschneider and Krcmar, 2009) and are, moreover, also listed in the literature among potential crowdsourcing initiatives (Brabham, 2009; Terwiesch and Xu, 2008).”
- Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 (2012, background): “The motivators for competition-driven citizen-sourcing are quite natural because material incentives and career opportunities invigorate participatory activism (Brabham, 2009b).”
- Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns (2016, background): “– (2006a, p.1; 2006b, p.1) This definition to date remains the most prominent scientific one, which we will therefore follow (Brabham, 2009; Starbird, 2012).”