Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Decisions of the Chinese Listed Firms

By Yuni Wen, K. Rwegasira, J. Bilderbeek. 2002

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions (2015, unknown): “…to all China studies on CEO compensation reviewed in Table I, our sample has the longest time span containing data from eight years, whereas most previous studies on listed firms use a shorter span of two to four years (Buck et al., 2008; Firth et al., 2006; Kato and Long, 2006; Wen et al., 2002).”
Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance (2021, background): “Several capital structure studies focus on examining the relationship between the main characteristics of CG and capital structure, such as board size, board composition, board independence, ownership structure, chief executive officer (CEO) tenure, CEO duality, management compensation, disclosure, ”
Corporate governance mechanisms and capital structure in UAE (2012, background): “We also find that dividend policy is negatively associated with debt-to-equity ratio, while firms’ size is positively associated with debt-to-equity ratio.”
Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle: UK evidence (2011, background): “Additionally, Abor and Biekpe (2005) showed positive relationships between capital-structure and board composition (percentage of outside directors), while Wen et al. (2002) found a negative association between outside directors and capital-structure.”