Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra
By William C. Skamarock. 2004
1,028 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5287e36139c615281f126e047555cc9c1ead81ac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- David L. Williamson
- Christiane Jablonowski
- Fuqing Zhang
- H. Shin
- Song‐You Hong
- Christopher A. Davis
- René Laprise
- F. Vitart
In Global and Planetary Change
- Christiane Jablonowski
- David L. Williamson
- Fuqing Zhang
- René Laprise
- F. Vitart
- Christopher A. Davis
- E. Bou‐Zeid
- Joseph B. Klemp
Citations in the corpus
- Structure and Evolution of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics in Convection‐Permitting Simulations Over the United States (2018, background): “Further, while 4-km grid spacing CPMmay be able to resolve mesoscale features associated with MCSs, the effective resolution (typically about seven horizontal grid spacing; e.g., Skamarock, 2004) is insufficient to resolve turbulence.”
- The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid (2006, background): “Skamarock (2004) has performed a large statistical study of high-resolution forecast simulations, initialized with large-scale fields corresponding to observed data.”
- Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications (2018, methodology): “A common strategy to improve computational efficiency is to use explicit time-splitting schemes as shown by Wicker and Skamarock (2002). In Meso-NH, explicit Runge–Kutta”
- Atmospheric Kinetic Energy Spectra from Global High-Resolution Nonhydrostatic Simulations (2014, background): “The slopes steepen again in the tails, indicating the effect of model filters on the kinetic energy (Skamarock 2004).”
- Representation of the Subgrid-Scale Turbulent Transport in Convective Boundary Layers at Gray-Zone Resolutions (2015, methodology): “Moreover, the spectral peak scale (1– 2 z i ) is below the effective resolution (6–7 D ) for D 5 1000m (cf. Skamarock 2004), and the numerical diffusion by the fifth-order horizontal advection scheme dominates the energy spectrum, resulting in a smaller contribution from the SGS parameterization…”
- The pros and cons of diffusion, filters and fixers in Atmospheric General Circulation Models (2011, methodology): “Models like WRF (Skamarock et al 2008), CAM FV (Collins et al 2004) or the stretched-grid finite-difference model by Fox-Rabinovitz et al (1997) set the default to q = 1.”
- Atmospheric Predictability: Why Butterflies Are Not of Practical Importance (2014, methodology): “Atmospheric kinetic energy density spectrum as a function of one-dimensional horizontal wavenumber adapted from Skamarock (2004), which is in turn based on data from Nastrom and Gage (1985) as plotted by Lindborg (1999).”
- Importance of Resolving Kuroshio Front and Eddy Influence in Simulating the North Pacific Storm Track (2017, methodology): “Validation analyses are performed using the last five months [November–March (NDJFM)] of the WRF simulations with the first month of the simulations (October of 2007) considered as model spinup (Skamarock 2004).”
- A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications (2008, methodology): “There is also a sharp dropoff of energy at wavelength of approximately 7Dx–8Dx consistent with the summer season forecast-derived spectra [34].”
- Resolving Tropical Cyclone Intensity in Models (2018, background): “In most grid point models, the filter scale is at least six grid lengths (Skamarock, 2004), and sometimes, it is far greater.”
- Regional climate modelling (2008, background): “…indicates that length scales smaller than several grid points (from 2 to 10, depending on the accuracy standard) are inaccurately handled (e.g. [78] [91]), the coarse grids of operational CGCMs preclude resolving with sufficient accuracy several processes that are deemed important for direct…”
- Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation (2013, background): “This model-induced limitation may be closely related to the model effective resolution [Skamarock, 2004], or the minimum scale resolved by the discretized model.”
- Experiences with 0–36-h Explicit Convective Forecasts with the WRF-ARW Model (2008, methodology): “This result is also consistent with the kinetic energy spectral analyses of Skamarock (2004), who showed more generally that small-scale structures in such simulations are effectively spun up over the initial 6–12 h.”
- Nested Mesoscale Large-Eddy Simulations with WRF: Performance in Real Test Cases (2012, methodology): “…and nests aimed to minimize such transition effects: 1) we always use a nesting ratio ( dx coarse / dx fine ) of 3, as recommended for WRF (Skamarock2004), toensure that the small-scale information is gradually generated as the grid is refined and 2) we center our domains in their parents…”
- Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations (2015, background): “Here, we assume L/∆x∼ 2− 10; Skamarock (2004)990 suggested that the effective resolution is about six times the grid spacing.”
- Evaluation of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations in Tropical Cyclones by Comparison of In Situ Observations and High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Isabel (2003). Part I: Initialization, Maximum Winds, and the Outer-Core Boundary Layer (2009, methodology): “Using an earlier version of WRF, Skamarock (2004) estimated the effective horizontal resolution of the model was 7 times the actual grid spacing.”