Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept

By A. Shenhar, Dov Dvir, Ofer Levy, A. Maltz. 2001

1,079 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/524dbb2c6592fd7889e96f0745b6ec5ce9c5adc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Business development success in SMEs: a case study approach (2008, background): “The future potentiality can be measured or assessed after 3-5 years (Shenhar et al., 2001).”
Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence (2010, methodology): “An adjusted definition of project success, based on the work of e.g. Shenhar et al. (2001), which considers project success in general, and e.g. Agarwal and Rathod (2006) and Procaccino and Verner (2006), which focuses on IT project success in particular is suggested here.”
Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures (2006, background): “put it, “how does the current project help prepare the organization for future challenges?” (Shenhar et al., 2001).”
Management Control and Strategic Renewal in the Front End of Innovation (2009, neutral): “Instead of artificial facts and measures that assume complex causalities in the innovation process, the explorative nature of the front end requires putting emphasis on more immediate and perception-based criteria (Shenhar et al., 2001; Smith-Doerr, Manev, and Rizova, 2004).”
Exploring the impact of cultural values on project performance: The effects of cultural values, age and gender on the perceived importance of project success/failure factors (2014, background): “quality (Rubin and Seeling, 1967), it is now generally accepted that measures of success or failure should go beyond this triangle (Thomas and Fernández, 2008); should be dynamic and flexible (Shenhar et al., 2001); and should incorporate the perspectives of different stakeholders (Fowler and Walsh,”
Impact of Relationship Value on Project Portfolio Success - Investigating the Moderating Effects of Portfolio Characteristics and External Turbulence (2013, background): “Future preparedness reflects the preparedness of the organization and its technological infrastructure for future needs (Levine, 2005; Shenhar et al., 2001) and evaluates the long-term benefits and opportunities offered by the projects (e.g., creation of new markets, development of new/improved…”