Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group based emotions

By A. Iyer, C. Leach, Anne Pedersen. 2004

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5200cf573167d12e4514f13025e0a147d651bec7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Dominic Abrams
2. Bertjan Doosje
3. G. Viki
4. Sven Zebel
5. M. Hogg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Viki
2. Dominic Abrams
3. Bertjan Doosje
4. Sven Zebel
5. Julie Van de Vyver
6. Barbara M. Masser
7. M. Hogg
8. N. Ellemers

Citations in the corpus

• Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of support for reparation policies (2008, background): “Not surprisingly therefore, self-critical emotions such as guilt and the associated intentions for reparation are not very common, especially in relation to intergroup wrong doing (e.g., Cohen, 2001; Iyer et al., 2004).”
• Testing the prosocial effectiveness of the prototypical moral emotions: Elevation increases benevolent behaviors and outrage increases justice behaviors (2015, background): “This measure was adapted from Iyer et al. (2007). It is considered a justice-relevant measure as it assesses responses to inequality.”