The strategic use of innovation to influence regulatory standards

By Steven L. Puller. 2006

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51b58937c9dbee0597f8565e27b789cfe7c24444

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Edward S. Rubin
2. Jaegul Lee
3. Francisco Veloso
4. David A. Hounshell
5. Christian Berggren
6. Reyer Gerlagh
7. Bob van der Zwaan

In Marketing

1. Jaegul Lee
2. Francisco Veloso
3. David A. Hounshell

In Strategy and Management

1. Jaegul Lee
2. Francisco Veloso
3. David A. Hounshell
4. Christian Berggren

Citations in the corpus

• Forcing technological change: A case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US (2010, background): “Poor credibility of a regulatory agency as far as enforcing the standards are concerned may encourage firms to behave strategically, such as by influencing the regulator to be less strict in the enforcement of the standards or to encourage it to delay enforcement (Lutz et al., 2000; Puller, 2006).”
• Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry (2011, background): “Firms under regulatory pressure are also likely act strategically to influence a regulatory agency to either lower standards or delay enforcement dates (Yao, 1988; Lutz et al., 2000; Puller, 2006), and regulatory agencies may end up having to bargain with regulated firms (Amacher and Malik, 1998).”