What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach

By M. Stone. 2006

583 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51aedd94bec885104427258d6bbf4a725411a56f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. R. Hill
2. Quan Gan
3. Kate Mattingly
4. J. Morrissey

In Economics and Econometrics

1. R. Hill
2. Qianjin Hao
3. D. Pevalin
4. Jie Chen
5. Quan Gan
6. M. Stephens
7. Kate Mattingly
8. J. Morrissey

In Finance

1. R. Hill
2. Qianjin Hao
3. Jie Chen
4. Quan Gan
5. M. Stephens
6. Kate Mattingly
7. Andrew Beer
8. J. Morrissey

Citations in the corpus

• Housing affordability, tenure and mental health in Australia and the United Kingdom: a comparative panel analysis (2016, background): “This measure of housing affordability has been applied widely in North America (Hulchanski, 1995; Linneman & Megbolugbe, 1992), Australia (Baker et al., 2013) and Europe (Whitehead, 1991), although alternative measures have been proposed (e.g. Stone, 2006).”
• Measuring Housing Affordability: Looking Beyond the Median (2009, background): “Examples of the former include Hulchanski (1995), Kutty (2005) and Stone (2006).”
• Assessing Housing Affordability in Post-reform China: A Case Study of Shanghai (2010, background): “This level of poverty, which develops from the concept of shelter poverty (Armenoff, 1998; Bratt, 1995; Nunez, 1994, Stone, 2006a), has been identified alternatively as housing-induced poverty (Kutty, 2005).”
• Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, unknown): “costs, such as the house price to income ratio approach [20] , the residual measure (income remaining after housing costs) [21] and, since the impact of the latest recession, purchase and repayment affordability measures [7].”
• Housing and transport expenditure: Socio-spatial indicators of affordability in Auckland (2014, background): “While there is no single agreed measure, the most frequently employed is that of housing expenditure-to-income ratio (Hulchanski, 1995; Jewkes, Delgadillo, & Lucy, 2010; Stone, 2006).”
• An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method (2013, unknown): “This is primarily due to its arbitrary and normative nature [7,13,14,16] and inability to account for issues such as housing quality [15].”