Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage Through Collaborative Innovation Networks
By Peter Cebon. 2006
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/517224f53b3bca3c5e7d5cb4457870f3468d2963
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Richard Reeve
- Richard Messina
- Jianwei Zhang
- Martha G. Russell
- Marlene Scardamalia
- V. Glăveanu
- Nataliya Smorodinskaya
Citations in the corpus
- Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities (2009, methodology): “(Gloor, 2006, p. 11) An organic, flexible, and distributed social structure favors an emergent social process of knowledge creation in that it encourages members to collectively define goals as emergents of the communicative process in which they are engaged (Valsiner & Veer, 2000) and to redefine…”
- Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation (2018, background): “…of networks worldwide implies that innovative goods, technologies and values will be increasingly co-created by networked actors that collaborate with each other to form a certain, relatively sustainable ecosystem of actors, assets and linkages (Gloor, 2006; Russell et al., 2016; Wessner, 2005).”
- How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers (2011, background): “All is achieved of course if members communicate with one another, don’t withhold information and allow the free flow of ideas (Gloor, 2006), and therefore both intend to share and participate in the construction of a common space.”