Thought, Emotions, and Social Interactional Processes in Moral Development

By Melanie Killen, J. Smetana. 2006

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5146ebd7c193f5b5e788b1a0f8306c3a90ab6bb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach (2013, background): “…work on moral psychology has mainly addressed individual-level moral decision making (e.g., Kohlberg, 1969; Piaget, 1965; Schwartz, 1970; see also Turiel, 1983, 2006), or has identified the implications of group-level moral transgressions (e.g., Čehajić-Clancy, Effron, Halperin, Liberman, &…”
The Psychology of Moral Conviction (2010, background): “The idea that people can access and report on moral concerns is supported by social domain theory (e.g., Turiel, 2006) and research on people’s ability to distinguish between preferences, normative conventions, and moral concerns.”
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment (2010, methodology): “In economics, the most widely-used experimental paradigm for studying cooperation is the prisoner’s dilemma (Axelrod and Hamilton, 1981), in which two individuals maximize their total payoffs by cooperating, but maximize their individual payoffs by not cooperating (“defecting”).”
Morality (2008, background): “Turiel (2006) explicitly links this definition of morality to the long tradition of liberal political theory from Kant, through John Stuart Mill, to John Rawls.”
Emotional Awareness: On the Importance of Including Emotional Aspects in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) (2013, unknown): “That is, emotional conceptualizations of different phenomena may be acquired in an elaborative and thorough fashion, but once obtained can be applied in a rapid manner (Turiel, 2006; see also Roeser, 2010b).”
Morality in Groups: On the Social‐Regulatory Functions of Right and Wrong (2012, background): “…judgments (e.g., Haidt & Kesebir, 2010), have distinguished between different moral foundations or principles that can guide such judgments (Haidt, 2001, 2008; Haidt & Graham, 2007; Turiel, 2006), and have specified the social concerns associated with each of these principles (Rai & Fiske, 2011).”
The Moral Foreign-Language Effect (2016, background): “Rationalists contend that moral judgment is driven primarily by reason (Kohlberg, 1984; Turiel, 2004).”
Moral Education for Sustainable Development: Comparison of University Teachers’ Perceptions in China and Pakistan (2020, background): “This approach depends on moral reasoning, moral judgment, participation in solving different problems, and decision making [31,34,35].”