Assessing the Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Firm Performance, Plant Productivity, and Workers: New Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data

By Donald S. Siegel, Kenneth L. Simons. 2010

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda (2020, unknown): “Firm strategy and behaviours have a strong relationship with CFP (e.g., Dechow, 1994; Artz, Norman, Hatfield, & Cardinal, 2010; Kreiser & Davis, 2010; Siegel & Simons, 2010; Lee & Jungbae Roh, 2012).”
Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets (2016, background): “Labor-intensive firms may prefer greenfield entries to acquisitions because post-acquisition integration costs can be very high due to over-employment problems (Siegel & Simons, 2010).”
Management Practices Across Firms and Countries (2012, background): “…are consistent with empirical studies indicating that private equity transactions in the United States and the United Kingdom result in a substantial increase in productivity (Cumming, Siegel, & Wright, 2007; Harris, Siegel, & Wright, 2005; Lichtenberg & Siegel, 1990; Siegel & Simons, 2010).”
Productivity, Restructuring, And The Gains From Takeovers (2013, unknown): “…capital expenditures to investment opportunities, rises 1Other studies, including Lichtenberg (1992), McGuckin and Nguyen (2001), Yang (2008), Siegel and Simons (2010), Maksimovic, Phillips, and Prabhala (2011), and Maksimovic, Phillips, and Yang (2013) find similar results. significantly…”