Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain

By Randall C. O’Reilly, Yuko Munakata. 2000

864 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Banishing the homunculus: making working memory work. (2006, background): “Previously , we have proposed that the anterior-posterior (and perhaps dorsal-ventral) axis of the PFC might be organized along a gradient from abstract to concrete, respectively (O'Reilly et al., 2002; O'Reilly & Munakata , 2000).”
The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth (2005, background): “Some theorists have argued that semantic representations are better characterized as distributed across a network (e.g., O’Reilly & Munakata, 2000; Rogers & McClelland, 2004), in part based on the fact that with aging and the onset of dementia, semantic concepts typically degrade gradually rather…”
Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretation (2017, background): “A good source for such neural theories is (O’Reilly & Munakata, 2000).”
Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective (2002, background): “…has been hypothesized as the main dimension through which cortical and hippocampal representations differ (McClelland, McNaughton, & O'Reilly, 1995; O'Reilly & Munakata, 2000), with the latter becoming active only when the specific conjunctions of features that they code for are active themselves.”
Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis (2003, methodology): “This model is our “standard model” of the hippocampus and neocortex (O’Reilly et al., 1998; O’Reilly and Munakata, 2000; O’Reilly and Rudy, 2001; Rudy and O’Reilly, 2001) The basic mechanisms of this model incorporate widely accepted ideas of cortical function in one coherent framework called Leabra”
A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. (2011, methodology): “This equilibrium form of the equation can be understood in terms of a Bayesian decision making framework (O’Reilly & Munakata, 2000).”
Theta Lingua Franca: A Common Mid-Frontal Substrate for Action Monitoring Processes (2011, background): “Although these influential theories may appear to suggest functional differences , one can also highlight computa - tional similarities between mismatch comparison and measures of coactivity such as free energy or entropy ( Friston , 2003 , 2005 ; O ' Reilly & Munakata , 2000 ) .”