Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis

By Zongzhi Z. Liu, Catherine A. Lozupone, Micah Hamady, Frederic D. Bushman, Rob Knight. Nucleic Acids Research, 2007

708 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Pyrosequencing technology allows us to characterize microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences orders of magnitude faster and more cheaply than has previously been possible. However, results from different studies using pyrosequencing and traditional sequencing are often difficult to compare, because amplicons covering different regions of the rRNA might yield different conclusions. We used sequences from over 200 globally dispersed environments to test whether studies that used similar primers clustered together mistakenly, without regard to environment. We then tested whether primer choice affects sequence-based community analyses using UniFrac, our recently-developed method for comparing microbial communities. We performed three tests of primer effects. We tested whether different simulated amplicons generated the same UniFrac clustering results as near-full-length sequences for three recent large-scale studies of microbial communities in the mouse and human gut, and the Guerrero Negro microbial mat. We then repeated this analysis for short sequences (100-, 150-, 200- and 250-base reads) resembling those produced by pyrosequencing. The results show that sequencing effort is best focused on gathering more short sequences rather than fewer longer ones, provided that the primers are chosen wisely, and that community comparison methods such as UniFrac are surprisingly robust to variation in the region sequenced.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/506e73c750085835c12b2e16a68c5e920c051ee5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Noah Fierer
  3. Patrick D. Schloss
  4. C. Lauber
  5. Micah Hamady
  6. J. Gregory Caporaso
  7. Haiyan Chu
  8. William Walters

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Noah Fierer
  3. Patrick D. Schloss
  4. C. Lauber
  5. Micah Hamady
  6. J. Gregory Caporaso
  7. Curtis Huttenhower
  8. William Walters

Citations in the corpus