Reorienting Economics
By Brian Pinkstone. 2003
304 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Social Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/506bb0a09c1b2cfb1b73daaf7bb04b1133739a47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tony Lawson
- John B. Davis
- P. Downward
- S. Marginson
- David Dequech
- Geoffrey M. Hodgson
- C. Spash
- Jamie Peck
In General Social Sciences
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Downward
- John B. Davis
- S. Marginson
- Tony Lawson
- Brad R. Humphreys
- J. Ruseski
- C. Breuer
- Kirstin Hallmann
Citations in the corpus
- The nature of heterodox economics (2006, methodology): “…of relevance here is that if economics is to be distinguished as a strand of social research it cannot be according to its own ontology, methodological principles, or substantive claims, but in terms only of its particular focus of interest (I elaborate on all this in Lawson, 2003, chapter 6).”
- Evolutionary realism: a new ontology for economics (2004, unknown): “But this is a challenge that must ultimately be met – as Mäki (2001), Vromen (2001), Herrmann-Pillath (2001) and Lawson (2003) have all recently and very clearly signalled – if evolutionary theory is ever to have a central role in social science in general and economics in particular.”
- Limitations of human capital theory* (2019, methodology): “(Lawson 2003, 5, emphasis in original) If mathematical sets in economics are universally relevant, strict ‘event regularities’ must be ubiquitous in the real world.”
- Meta-Regression Analysis as the Socio-Economics of Economic Research (2008, unknown): “We view ‘empirical reality’ as an emergent statistical property (Lawson, 2003).”
- The Nature of Heterodox Economics (2006, background): “…mainstream economics is that it is everywhere formalistic and deductive, that this leads it to a closed systems approach based on identifying social event regularities, and that this is inappropriate strategy for dealing with the subject matter with which economics is concerned (Lawson,1997, 2003).”
- Exploring the Economic Choice to Participate in Sport: Results from the 2002 General Household Survey (2007, background): “See, for example, Lawson (1997, 2003), Downward (2003) and Lewis (2004), which explore the philosophical, theoretical and empirical aspects of this debate.”
- The Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding Variation Across Local Communities (2010, unknown): “These communities thus resemble quasi-experimental situations in which event regularities can be observed (Lawson, 2003).”